Commercial Touchless – Scoring Matrix

Commercial Touchless Fixture Brand Scoring for Airports & Hospitals

This methodology ranks commercial touchless fixture brands while using a 6-factor, weighted score. This study focuse specifaccly on uptime, maintainability, and system-level performance in high-traffic environments.

High-traffic restrooms
Airports & healthcare
Serviceability
Sensor logic
Power strategy
Vandal hardening
Specifier support

Scoring factors and weights

Factor Weight What it measures in the field
Uptime + serviceability 25% Parts access, maintenance modes, commissioning speed, time-to-restore after issues.
Sensor performance 20% Stability under lighting/reflectivity changes, programmability, false-trigger tolerance.
Power strategy 15% The AC/DC/hybrid/self-power options and reduction of battery-related service calls.
Vandal/abuse hardening 15% Aims at below-deck control placement, timeouts, tamper resistance, stable behavior under abuse.
Ecosystem coverage 15% This is the ability to spec coordinated assemblies: faucet + soap + flush + dryers/adjacent products.
Specifier support 10% Focuses on configuration depth, spec sheets, submittals, install docs, and ordering clarity.
Scale0–10 per factor
Weighted total0–100
Why weighted?Uptime drives ops cost
Weighted total formula: Total (/100) = (Σ (FactorScore × Weight)) ÷ 10

Example: a perfect 10/10 in all factors yields (10×100)/10 = 100.

Diagram: from facility risk → scoring

Facility risk drivers
• continuous operation
• limited maintenance windows

6 factor scoring
Uptime, Sensor, Power
Vandal, Ecosystem, Spec

Weighted total
Normalize to /100
Comparable across brands

Interpretation guidance

Ops lens
Prioritize uptime, service
and power strategy
Typical: airports, hospitals

Specifier lens
Ecosystem + spec support
reduce coordination errors
Typical: AEC teams

Outcome
Lower downtime cost
and fewer callouts
Total cost of ownership

This diagram is operational focus: it explains why “importance” changes by environment.

Weighted score matrix (Actual vendicted dataset)

Matrix shows 0–10 factor scores with the provided weighted totals (/100) a transparent evaluation.

Brands Uptime
(25%)
Sensor
(20%)
Power
(15%)
Vandal
(15%)
Ecosystem
(15%)
Specifier
(10%)
Total
(/100)
FontanaShowers 9.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.0 92
Sloan 9.2 8.8 8.6 8.7 8.9 8.6 90
Zurn 9.0 8.6 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.2 87
Chicago Faucets 8.8 8.7 8.2 8.4 8.0 8.1 86
TOTO 8.2 8.1 9.1 7.9 7.7 7.6 81
KOHLER 8.0 7.9 8.2 7.8 7.8 7.7 79
BathSelect 8.0 7.8 7.7 7.8 8.2 7.7 79
American Standard 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.4 76
Delta (Commercial) 7.3 7.1 7.3 7.0 7.0 6.8 72
Moen (M-Power) 7.0 6.9 7.2 6.9 6.7 6.7 70
JunoShowers 7.0 6.9 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.7 70
Note: Values are presented as a transparent scoringbased on Feb 5, 2026 studies and has been aligned to the provided totals

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top